From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Legal agreement in U.S. anti-trust litigation
In United States telecommunication law, the Modification of Final Judgment (MFJ ) is the August 24, 1982 consent decree concerning the antitrust lawsuit of January 14, 1949, United States vs. Western Electric Company and American Telephone and Telegraph Company and its Final Judgment on January 24, 1956, the latter of which it vacated.[ 1] The decree was made with Harold H. Greene as presiding judge in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia .[ 2]
The terms required the breakup of the Bell System and a reorganization of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T), including removing local telephone service from AT&T control and placing business restrictions on the divested regional telephone companies in exchange for removing other longstanding restrictions on the types of business AT&T could enter.[ 3] : 125 [ 4] [ 2] : 143 (also footnote 4)
The MFJ also consolidated the case United States v. AT&T filed on November 20, 1974.
This article incorporates public domain material from Federal Standard 1037C . General Services Administration . Archived from the original on 2022-01-22.
Statutes and regulations Supreme Court case law
Sherman Antitrust Act Section 1 case lawSherman Antitrust Act Section 2 case lawOther Sherman Antitrust Act cases
United States v. E. C. Knight Co. (1895)
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association (1897)
Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States (1899)
Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904)
Swift & Co. v. United States (1905)
Loewe v. Lawlor (1908)
Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. (1911)
United States v. Terminal Railroad Association (1912)
Chicago Board of Trade v. United States (1918)
United States v. Colgate & Co. (1919)
Federal Baseball Club v. National League (1922)
United States v. General Electric Co. (1926)
Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States (1939)
Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United States (1940)
Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC (1941)
United States v. Masonite Corp. (1942)
United States v. Univis Lens Co. (1942)
Parker v. Brown (1943)
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n (1944)
Associated Press v. United States (1945)
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States (1945)
Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. (1946)
United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. (1948)
United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1948–1950)
Besser Manufacturing Co. v. United States (1951)
Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States (1953)
Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc. (1953)
United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. (1955)
Radovich v. National Football League (1957)
Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. (1959)
United States v. Parke, Davis & Co. (1960)
Haywood v. National Basketball Association (1971)
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. (1971)
Flood v. Kuhn (1972)
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS Inc. (1979)
California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. (1980)
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp. (1982)
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (1985)
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. (1992)
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California (1993)
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (2006)
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC (2015)
Interstate Commerce Act case lawClayton Antitrust Act case lawFTC Act case lawRobinson–Patman Act case lawOther cases
Other federal case law Ongoing litigation ‡ Related topics ‡ date of filing
Local telephone companies still extant
Wholly owned Partially owned
Other subsidiaries
Manufacturing Research Long distance Wireless Regional Bell companies